N. Basilashvili
To Win
F. Misolic
To Win
Filip Misolic vs Michal Novansky Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W W L
Form
L L L L W L W L W LHead-To-Head: Misolic 1 - 0 Novansky
They have played 2 sets in total, with Misolic winning 2 and Novansky winning 0. The last match between Misolic and Novansky was at the M15 Novi Sad, 05-08-2021, Second, Clay with Filip Misolic getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Filip Misolic | 1 |
| Michal Novansky | 0 |
M15 Novi Sad(05-08-2021)
6
4
7
6
| Misolic | Stats | Novansky |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (20-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 184 | Ranking | N/A |
| 126 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 23 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 62% (179-112) | Career Total W/L | 49% (50-52) |
| $352,360 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
29 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Filip Misolic
Player
Michal Novansky
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
47 of
101)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:10:0 | Average Match Time | 2:10:0 |
| 55% (41/74) | 1st Serve % | 47% (47/101) |
| 76% (31/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (32/47) |
| 67% (22/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (28/54) |
| 15% (2/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 41% (41/101) | Return Points Win % | 28% (21/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Filip Misolic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Filip Misolic
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Federico Coria
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
35
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Filip Misolic
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Ugo Blanchet
46%
(
17 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
90%
(
18 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
11%
(
4 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Matteo Martineau
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Filip Misolic
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Michal Novansky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthias Ujvary
Player
Michal Novansky
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
29 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
51
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Peter Nad
Player
Michal Novansky
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Josip Simundza
Player
Michal Novansky
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Michal Novansky
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Michal Novansky
57%
(
64 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
61%
(
30 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
40 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (179/112) | Win/Loss | 49% (50/52) |
| 57% (385/291) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (116/115) |
| 53% (3365/3041) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1158/1129) |
| 48% (20/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (22/15) |
| 66% (143/74) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (25/31) |
| 53% (16/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (3/6) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 706 | Aces Total | 113 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 661 | Total Double Faults | 198 |
| 1:32:19 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 377.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 333.51 |
| 58% (10847/18755) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1984/3420) |
| 68% (7336/10847) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1279/1984) |
| 51% (3995/7908) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (656/1436) |
| 44% (834/1897) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (128/323) |
| 41% (7466/18393) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1293/3302) |
| 47% (7/8) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (24/15) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (75/56) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 70% (69/30) | Futures W/L | 50% (50/51) |
| 62% (175/284) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (50/102) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (46/78) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (15/27) |
| 69% (66/95) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 90% (157/142) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (55/45) |
| 10% (157/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (55/10) |
| 27% (133/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (47/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
